EEOC Year-End Countdown

Tag Archives: conciliation

No Means No – Judge Limits The EEOC’s Claims In Bass Pro Case (Again)

Posted in EEOC Litigation

Seyfarth Synopsis: In the high-profile EEOC race discrimination litigation against Bass Pro, the Court denied the EEOC’s motion for a ruling that would have allowed it to include in its § 706 claims those individuals who had not yet applied to work for Bass Pro when the mandatory Title VII conciliation process took place.

***

The latest chapter of the … Continue Reading

Bullseye On Big Business: EEOC’s 2016 Performance And Accountability Report Shows Target On Systemic Litigation

Posted in EEOC Litigation

By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Christopher DeGroff, Matthew Gagnon, and Alex W. Karasik

Seyfarth Synopsis: The EEOC recently released its annual Performance and Accountability Report for the fiscal year 2016, a must-read for employers regarding statistical data on EEOC litigation. Continuing a trend from recent years, the EEOC has reaffirmed its commitment to targeting companies in high-profile systemic … Continue Reading

More Mach Mining: Court Denies The EEOC’s Motion For Reconsideration Of Discovery Order

Posted in EEOC Litigation

By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr. and Alex W. Karasik

Seyfarth Synopsis: In the remand of the high profile Mach Mining litigation that was before the Supreme Court in 2015, a district court denied the EEOC’s motion for reconsideration of a discovery order pertaining to the scope of the EEOC’s investigation, and denied the EEOC’s motion to amend its complaint to … Continue Reading

After A Decade Of Mixed Results, EEOC Rebrands Its Systemic Discrimination Litigation Program

Posted in Strategic / Policy Initiatives

By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Christina M. Janice and Alex W. Karasik

Seyfarth Synopsis: With the publication of a ten-year review of its systemic discrimination program on July 7, 2016, the EEOC seeks to blunt employer and judicial scrutiny of the EEOC’s litigation practices by emphasizing its internal staffing and technological improvements, the gains it has made over time … Continue Reading

“We Don’t Want To Pay $4.7 Million” – EEOC Files Its Supreme Court Brief in CRST Fee Sanction Case

Posted in EEOC Litigation

By Gerald L. Maatman Jr., Christopher DeGroff, Christina M. Janice, and Alex W. Karasik

As we recently blogged here, EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc. is an important case on the Supreme Court’s docket that employers absolutely need to monitor.  At issue is whether attorneys’ fees are appropriate in instances where the EEOC failed to satisfy … Continue Reading

Mach Mining Part 3: Supreme Court Gem Resurfaces In Southern District Of Illinois

Posted in EEOC Litigation

By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Christina M. Janice, and Alex W. Karasik

Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Mach Mining v. EEOC, 135 S.Ct. 1645 (2015), which held that a judge may review whether the EEOC satisfied its statutory obligation to attempt conciliation before filing suit, and that the scope of that review is narrow, the … Continue Reading

2015’s Top 5 Most Intriguing Decisions In EEOC-Initiated Litigation (And A Preview Of Our Annual EEOC Litigation Report)

Posted in EEOC Litigation

By Gerald L. Maatman, Jr., Christopher J. DeGroff, and Matthew J. Gagnon

We are pleased to offer our loyal blog readers our analysis of the five most intriguing decisions in 2015 relative to EEOC lawsuits, along with a pre-publication preview of our annual report on developments and trends in EEOC-initiated litigation. That book, entitled EEOC-Initiated Litigation: Case Law Developments Continue Reading